Golden plates Wikipedia. According to Latter Day Saint belief, the golden plates also called the gold plates or in some 1. Understanding The Bible Stephen Harris Pdf Editor' title='Understanding The Bible Stephen Harris Pdf Editor' />Joseph Smith said he translated the Book of Mormon, a sacred text of the faith. Some witnesses described the plates as weighing from 3. D shaped rings. 4Smith said he found the plates on September 2. Manchester, New York, after the angel Moroni directed him to a buried stone box. Smith said the angel at first prevented him from taking the plates, but instructed him to return to the same location in a year. In September 1. 82. Smith returned home with a heavy object wrapped in a frock, which he then put in a box. Though he allowed others to heft the box, he said that the angel had forbidden him to show the plates to anyone until they had been translated from their original reformed Egyptian language. Smith dictated the text of the Book of Mormon over the next several years, claiming that it was a translation of the plates. He did this by using a seer stone, which he placed in the bottom of a hat and then placed the hat over his face to view the words written within the stone. Smith published the translation in 1. Book of Mormon. Smith eventually obtained testimonies from eleven men, known as the Book of Mormon witnesses, who said they had seen the plates. After the translation was complete, Smith said he returned the plates to the angel Moroni. Therefore the plates cannot now be examined. Latter Day Saints believe the account of the golden plates as a matter of faith, while critics often assert that either Smith manufactured the plates himself7 or that the Book of Mormon witnesses based their testimony on visions rather than physical experience. Origin and historicityeditIn the words of Mormon historian Richard Bushman, For most modern readers, the golden plates are beyond belief, a phantasm, yet the Mormon sources accept them as fact. Because Smith said he returned the plates to the angel Moroni after he finished translating them, their authenticity cannot be determined by physical examination. The golden plates were reportedly shown to several close associates of Smith. Mormon scholars have formed collaborations such as Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies to provide apologetic answers to critical research about the golden plates and topics in the field of Mormon studies. Among these topics, the credibility of the plates has been, according to Bushman, a troublesome item. A reputed transcript of reformed Egyptian characters, which Smith said were copied from the golden plates in 1. The characters are not linked to any known language. The Book of Mormon itself portrays the golden plates as a historical record, engraved by two pre Columbian prophet historians from around the year AD 4. Mormon and his son Moroni. Mormon and Moroni, the book says, had abridged earlier historical records from other sets of metal plates. Their script, according to the book, was described as reformed Egyptian, a language unknown to linguists or Egyptologists. Scholarly reference works on languages do not acknowledge the existence of either a reformed Egyptian language or reformed Egyptian script as it has been described in Mormon belief. No archaeological, linguistic, or other evidence of the use of Egyptian writing in ancient America has been discovered. Historically, Latter Day Saint movement denominations have taught that the Book of Mormons description of the plates origin is accurate, and that the Book of Mormon is a translation of the plates. The Community of Christ, however, while accepting the Book of Mormon as scripture, no longer takes an official position on the historicity of the golden plates. Moreover, even in the more theologically conservative Church of Jesus Christ of Latter day Saints LDS Church, some adherents who accept the Book of Mormon as inspired scripture do not believe it is a literal translation of a physical historical record. Non believers and some liberal Mormons have advanced naturalistic explanations for the story of the plates. TOC1.png' alt='Understanding The Bible Stephen Harris Pdf Editor' title='Understanding The Bible Stephen Harris Pdf Editor' />For example, it has been theorized that the plates were fashioned by Smith or one of his associates,1. Smith had the ability to convince others of their existence through illusions or hypnosis, 1. Story of the golden plateseditThe story of the golden plates consists of how, according to Joseph Smith and his contemporaries, the plates were found, received from the angel Moroni, translated, and returned to the angel prior to the publication of the Book of Mormon. Smith is the only source for a great deal of the story because much of it occurred at times when he was the only human witness. Nevertheless, Smith told the story to his family, friends, and acquaintances, and many of these provided second hand accounts. Other parts of the story are derived from the statements of those who knew Smith, including several witnesses who said they saw the golden plates. The best known elements of the golden plates story are found in an account told by Smith in 1. Latter Day Saint movement denominations. The LDS Church has canonized part of this 1. Eclectic gospel music site. New music and church reports added on a regular basis. My home church is famous Berean Seventhday Adventist Church in Atlanta GA. Timeline Faith in America How religious ideas and spiritual experiences have shaped Americas public life over the last 400 years. Links to related pages How to Write Footnotes and Endnotes in MLA Style Footnotes and Endnotes Examples in MLA Style How to Write Parenthetical References. Pearl of Great Price. BackgroundeditDuring the Second Great Awakening, Joseph Smith lived on his parents farm near Palmyra, New York. At the time churches in the region contended so vigorously for souls that western New York became known as the burned over district because the fires of religious revivals had burned over it so often. Western New York was also noted for its participation in a craze for treasure hunting. Beginning as a youth in the early 1. Smith was periodically hired, for about 1. Smiths contemporaries described his method for seeking treasure as putting the stone in a white stovepipe hat, putting his face over the hat to block the light, and then seeing the information in the reflections of the stone. Smith did not consider himself to be a peeper or glass looker, a practice he called nonsense. Rather, Smith and his family viewed their folk magical practices as spiritual gifts. Although Smith later rejected his youthful treasure hunting activities as frivolous and immaterial, he never repudiated the stones themselves nor denied their presumed power to find treasure, nor did he ever relinquish the magic culture in which he was raised. He came to view seeing with a stone in religious terms as the work of a seer. Osu Tatakae Ouendan Rom English Patch. Smiths first stone, apparently the same one he used at least part of the time to translate the golden plates, was chocolate colored and about the size of a chicken egg,2. The LDS Church released photographs of the stone on August 4, 2. Visual Basic .Net 2008 Tutorial Pdf on this page. Finding the plateseditAccording to Smith, he found the plates after he was directed to them by a heavenly messenger3. Moroni. 3. 4 According to the story, the angel first visited Smiths bedroom late at night, on September 2. Moroni told Smith that the plates could be found buried in a prominent hill near his home, later called Cumorah, a name found in the Book of Mormon. Before dawn, Moroni reappeared two more times and repeated the information. But the angel would not allow Smith to take the plates until he obeyed certain commandments. Smith recorded some of these commandments, but made it clear the main thrust of Moronis message was that he had to keep Gods commandments in general. Authorship of the Bible Wikipedia. Few biblicalbooks are regarded by scholars as the product of a single individual, and all have been edited to produce the works known today. The following article outlines the conclusions of the majority of contemporary scholars, along with the traditional views, both Jewish and Christian. Divine authorshipeditThe early Church Fathers agreed that the scriptures were inspired or dictated by God, but not on just which writings were scriptural as a result, the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches treat some books the Apocrypha as inspired, but the Protestant tradition does not there was similar debate over the New Testament, and the canon was not settled until the middle of the fourth century CE. The nature of divine authorship has long been the subject of dispute. Martin Luther claimed that the human authors of scripture received it by divine dictation, as did Pope Leo XIII in the 1. Catholic and Protestant, moved away from the divine dictation model and emphasised the role of the human authors. As a result, even many conservative scholars now accept, for example, that the Book of Isaiah has multiple authors and that 2 Corinthians is two letters joined together. Hebrew BibleeditThe Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh, is the collection of scriptures making up the Bible used by Judaism the same books, in a slightly different order, also make up the Protestant version of the Old Testament. The order used here follows the divisions used in Jewish Bibles. The first division of the Jewish Bible is the Torah, meaning Instruction or Law in scholarly literature it is frequently called by its Greek name, the Pentateuch five scrolls. Music Artists Free Mp3 Download English Songs. It is the group of five books made up of Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy and stands first in all versions of the Christian Old Testament. According to Rabbinic tradition the five books of the Torah were written by Moses, with the exception of the last eight verses of Deuteronomy which describe his death. Most Jews and Christians believed Mosaic authorship until the 1. Today, the majority of scholars agree that the Pentateuch does not have a single author, and that its composition took place over centuries. Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus and NumberseditFrom the late 1. Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers were created by combining four originally independent documents, known as the Jahwist, the Elohist, the Deuteronomist, and the Priestly sources. This approach has since seen various revisions,8 yet while the identification of distinctive Deuteronomistic and Priestly theologies and vocabularies remains widespread, they are used to form new approaches suggesting that the books were combined gradually over time by the slow accumulation of fragments of text, or that a basic text was supplemented by later authorseditors. At the same time there has been a tendency to bring the origins of the Pentateuch further forward in time, and the most recent proposals place it in 5th century BCE Judah under the Persian empire. DeuteronomyeditDeuteronomy is treated separately from Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers. Its place in the documentary hypothesis is anomalous, as it, unlike the other four, consists of a single source. The process of its formation probably took several hundred years, from the 8th century to the 6th,1. Deuteronomy mirror those of the prophets, especially Hosea, Levitical priestly circles because it stresses the role of the Levites, and wisdom and scribal circles because it esteems wisdom, and because the treaty form in which it is written would be best known to scribes. Deuteronomy was later used as the introduction to the comprehensive history of Israel written in the early part of the 6th century, and later still it was detached from the history and used to round off the Pentateuch. ProphetseditFormer prophetseditThe Former Prophets Neviim Rishonim, make up the first part of the second division of the Hebrew Bible, the Neviim, which translates as Prophets. In Christian Bibles the Book of Ruth, which belongs in the final section of the Hebrew Bible, is inserted between Judges and Samuel. According to Jewish tradition dating from at least the 2nd century CE, the Book of Joshua was by Joshua, the Book of Judges and the Books of Samuel were by the prophet Samuel with some passages by the prophets Gad and Nathan, while the two Books of Kings were by Jeremiah. Since 1. 94. 3 most scholars have accepted Martin Noths argument that Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings make up a single work, the so called Deuteronomistic history. Noth believed that the history was the work of a single author writing in the time of the Babylonian exile 5. BCE. This authoreditor took as his starting point an early version of the book of Deuteronomy, which had already been composed during the reign of Josiah last quarter of the 7th century, selecting, editing and composing it to produce a coherent work. Frank Moore Cross later proposed that an earlier version of the history was composed in Jerusalem in Josiahs time this first version, Dtr. Noths second edition, or Dtr. Still later scholars have discovered further layers and further author editors. In the 1. 99. 0s some scholars began to question the existence of a Deuteronomistic history1. Latter prophetseditModern scholars divide the Book of Isaiah into three parts, each with a different origin 2. First Isaiah, chapters 13. BCE prophet Isaiah and later expansions by his disciples 2. Deutero Isaiah chapters 4. Jewish author in Babylon near the end of the Babylonian captivity 2. Trito Isaiah chapters 5. Deutero Isaiah in Jerusalem immediately after the return from Babylon2. Deutero Isaiah after the fall of Babylon. This orderly sequence of pre exilic, exilic and post exilic material is somewhat misleading, as significant editing has clearly taken place in all three parts. JeremiaheditJeremiah lived in the late 7th and early 6th centuries BCE. The Book of Jeremiah presents Baruch ben Neriah as the prophets companion who writes his words on several occasions, and there has accordingly been much speculation that Baruch could have composed an early edition of the book. In the early 2. 0th century Sigmund Mowinckel identified three types of material in the book, Jeremiah 12. Type A being the words of Jeremiah himself, the biographic prose material Type B by an admirer writing c. BCE, and the remainder Type C from later periods. There has been considerable debate over Mowinckels ideas, notably the extent of the Jeremiah material and the role of Baruch, who may have been the author of the Type B material. It is generally agreed that the book has strong connections with the Deuteronomistic layers from the Former Prophets, recapitulating in modern terms the traditional idea that Jeremiah wrote both his own book and the Books of Kings. EzekieleditThe Book of Ezekiel describes itself as the words of Ezekiel ben Buzi, a priest living in exile in the city of Babylon between 5. BCE. 2. 7 The various manuscripts, however, differ markedly from each other, and it is clear that the book has been subjected to extensive editing.